Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2014 13:00:03 GMT 1
suppose we made a 20K area smack in the middle of the map, ghosted it clean and made it the fight arena, it would be accessible to all areas of the map and no one would have to leave thier home alliance to fight in it, battle could rage for an indefinate period of time . this would give more area to the small and non copmpliant alliances .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2014 13:04:08 GMT 1
Does that mean the big alliances keep their 10K nodes quota or we're staying with the 3K nodes as per original plan?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2014 13:10:58 GMT 1
it would also need to be ironed out but ideally the thing would be to downsize to 3K bases in order to go into arena and fight yet outside the ring would be safe from attacks.
|
|
|
Post by ladykiller on Feb 4, 2014 4:11:13 GMT 1
ok what about this . 1 person starts a alliance just for the fighting the leader has to kick him/her out so the 72 hr doesn't apply to them and then that prson gets his/her team toghter meets in the middle against the next team and battles it out and that person can pick up to 10 players to join them. start a small square so each person can join in. each team can only have 10 nodes to start out with so its fair to each team. then those 2 leaders chose how long the battle lasts for. but we have to set a goal so it doesn't last for like weeks .. this is a idea that was rattling around so I put it out there but I am just putting in my 2 cents and no I don't need change lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2014 14:40:12 GMT 1
the 72 hour cool down would not matter because the arena fight last longer than the 72 hour cool down period
|
|
oda
New Member
"DE OPPRESSO LIBER"
Posts: 10
|
Post by oda on Feb 5, 2014 2:03:26 GMT 1
ok what about this . 1 person starts a alliance just for the fighting the leader has to kick him/her out so the 72 hr doesn't apply to them and then that prson gets his/her team toghter meets in the middle against the next team and battles it out and that person can pick up to 10 players to join them. start a small square so each person can join in. each team can only have 10 nodes to start out with so its fair to each team. then those 2 leaders chose how long the battle lasts for. but we have to set a goal so it doesn't last for like weeks .. this is a idea that was rattling around so I put it out there but I am just putting in my 2 cents and no I don't need change lol i like this idea and i would add....fight is over when one of the two alliance manage to take the whole land in Arena and block all opponents bases.....something like a dead end
|
|
oda
New Member
"DE OPPRESSO LIBER"
Posts: 10
|
Post by oda on Feb 5, 2014 2:33:59 GMT 1
suppose we made a 20K area smack in the middle of the map, ghosted it clean and made it the fight arena, it would be accessible to all areas of the map and no one would have to leave thier home alliance to fight in it, battle could rage for an indefinate period of time . this would give more area to the small and non copmpliant alliances . I will suggest to downsize the ARENA to 10k as is the max reach cap for an alliance and share the other 10k to all other small alliances.....this way sector will be 100% used and no risk to have wanderers within ARENA.....besides that if we don't give enough space to small alliances they will probably occupy some place in ARENA and screw up all fight (even if we black all area or...... will rise the question whos gone take the other 10k in bases?)
|
|
|
an idea
Feb 15, 2014 18:27:20 GMT 1
Post by scorpius on Feb 15, 2014 18:27:20 GMT 1
My concern with these 'downsizing' ideas is that the WARs are expected to last 5 to 7 days and require people to leave their home alliances which they can not return to for 3 days. If by simple happen chance one alliance is much faster or has more people unavailable till day 3 .. whatever .. that alliance could be run out of the ARENA or worse, trapped (imprisoned) before getting to establish themselves and be really disappointed with this whole idea. I think the first priority of this entire idea was to try to create balanced, COMPETITIVE play to replace unopposed mind numbing chaining. But every idea may be used in part or whole as we, hopefully, evolve this entire concept.
|
|